North Carolina furniture company co-owner charged with murder after shooting business partner hours following court ruling

By Alex Tanzer, 
updated on June 20, 2026

An 85-year-old North Carolina furniture manufacturer allegedly shot and killed his 59-year-old business partner on Wednesday, just hours after a judge ordered him to pay more than $310,000 to settle a contract dispute between the two men. Willard Gary Black now faces a second-degree murder charge in the death of Robert Roger Arguelles at their shared company, Old Hickory Tannery.

Arguelles was struck in the chest and back during an argument at the business. Police officers arrived and attempted to save him, but he died at the scene. Black was booked into the Catawba County Detention Facility, Fox News Digital reported.

The timeline makes this case difficult to read as anything other than a man who refused to accept a court's decision, and allegedly turned to violence within hours. The facts that have emerged so far paint a grim picture of a business relationship that unraveled over money, ended in litigation, and culminated in a killing at the very place where the two men once worked side by side.

A business partnership gone wrong

Court records show the roots of the dispute stretch back to 2018, when Black sold Arguelles 49.9% of the stock in his furniture business. At some point after that transaction, the relationship soured. Arguelles maintained that he had loaned Black $280,000, of which only $23,876.19 was ever repaid.

The dispute landed in court. Both men eventually reached an agreement to settle the lawsuit for $310,882.74 and filed the paperwork. But Black then tried to back out, seeking to withdraw his consent from the deal.

On Wednesday, a judge denied that request and ordered Black to pay Arguelles the full amount of the original agreement. Hours later, authorities say, the two men got into an argument at Old Hickory Tannery. That argument ended with Arguelles shot in the chest and back.

Breitbart identified the business location as Newton, North Carolina, placing the shooting in Catawba County, consistent with Black's booking into the Catawba County Detention Facility.

A community loses a school board member

Arguelles was more than a business co-owner. He had served on the Alexander County Schools board since 2022, and his death sent shockwaves through the local school community. District Superintendent Bill Griffin issued a statement describing the man his district had lost.

"Amazing father, husband, and board member who has faithfully supported our school system for almost four years."

Griffin added that the district "fully supports and respects the family's privacy as they navigate this profound loss." The statement, while brief, pointed to a man who had invested himself in his community beyond his business interests, a life cut short over what amounted to a financial disagreement that the courts had already resolved.

North Carolina has seen its share of shocking violence in recent months. A North Carolina teen was recently charged as an adult in the shooting deaths of her parents and grandmother, another case where the most intimate relationships produced the most devastating outcomes.

The money trail

The gap between the $280,000 loan Arguelles claimed and the $310,882.74 settlement figure raises questions the available reporting does not fully answer. The difference, roughly $30,000, could represent interest, legal fees, or other damages. What is clear is that Black agreed to the settlement amount, filed it with the court, and then tried to undo it.

That sequence matters. Black was not ambushed by a judgment he never anticipated. He consented to the terms, put them before a judge, and only then attempted to withdraw. The court held him to his word. Within hours, his business partner was dead.

The New York Post reported that the shooting occurred during an argument at their shared business, corroborating the sequence of events described by authorities, a court ruling followed by a confrontation followed by gunfire.

No information has emerged about whether Black has retained legal counsel or offered any defense. The reporting does not indicate whether anyone else witnessed the shooting or whether Black made any statements to police at the scene.

What the charge tells us

Black faces second-degree murder, not first-degree. Under North Carolina law, the distinction typically hinges on premeditation. A first-degree charge would require prosecutors to prove Black planned the killing in advance. Second-degree murder requires malice but not necessarily a premeditated scheme.

The hours-long gap between the court ruling and the shooting could become a focal point as the case moves forward. Prosecutors may argue the timeline shows deliberation. Defense attorneys could counter that the argument at the business was spontaneous and the shooting was not planned.

Either way, a 59-year-old father, husband, and school board member is dead. The legal system had already addressed the financial dispute between these two men. A judge had issued a ruling. The process worked. What followed was a rejection of that process in the most violent terms possible.

Cases like this remind us that the rule of law depends on people accepting outcomes they don't like, a principle that applies in courtrooms, in elections, and in business disputes alike. When individuals decide the system's answer isn't good enough, the consequences fall on innocent people.

Unanswered questions

Several important details remain unclear. The specific law enforcement agency that responded to the scene and filed the charges has not been named in reporting so far. Whether Black was arrested at Old Hickory Tannery or turned himself in later is not established.

The nature of the argument that preceded the shooting, whether it was purely verbal or escalated physically before the gun was drawn, has not been described in detail. Nor is it clear whether the firearm was already at the business or was brought there after the court ruling.

These are the kinds of facts that will shape both the prosecution and any defense. For now, the bare outline is damning enough: a man lost a court case, argued with the man who won it, and allegedly killed him the same day.

The case also raises broader questions about how institutions and individuals handle moments of crisis, and what happens when someone decides a legal outcome is intolerable.

A life beyond the business

Robert Arguelles joined the Alexander County Schools board in 2022 and had served for nearly four years at the time of his death. Superintendent Griffin's description of him as an "amazing father, husband, and board member" suggests a man who gave his time to public service without fanfare.

That kind of quiet civic commitment is the backbone of small-town America. School boards in rural counties don't attract glory-seekers. They attract people who care about their neighbors' children. Arguelles, by all available accounts, was that kind of person.

His death leaves a vacancy on the school board, a hole in his family, and a community grappling with the kind of violence that has become grimly familiar across the country.

The bottom line

Willard Gary Black had every legal avenue available to him. He had lawyers. He had a courtroom. He had a judge who heard his request and ruled on it. The system gave him an answer he didn't want, and, authorities allege, he responded with a gun.

If the charges hold, this wasn't a failure of the justice system. It was a failure of one man to accept what the justice system told him.

Courts exist so that disputes over $310,000 don't end with someone shot in the chest. When a man decides the ruling doesn't apply to him, the cost is measured in something no settlement can repay.

About Alex Tanzer

Real Talk. Daily.

No spin. No fluff. Just the hard truth. served straight. Every morning, we cut through the noise and deliver what really matters to hardworking Americans. No agendas. No media games. Just real talk you can trust.