Trump orders third straight night of airstrikes against Iran, pledges to seize control of Strait of Hormuz

By Alex Tanzer
updated on July 14, 2026

U.S. Central Command launched a third consecutive night of precision strikes against Iranian military targets Monday, hammering coastal defenses, missile sites, and maritime capabilities across at least seven cities and islands along the Persian Gulf in a five-hour campaign that President Trump framed as the beginning of permanent American control over the Strait of Hormuz.

CENTCOM confirmed the strikes began at 4:45 p.m. ET and wrapped up at 10:15 p.m. ET, hitting targets in Bushehr, Bandar Abbas, Chah Bahar, Jask, Konarak, and the island of Abu Musa. Iranian state media separately reported explosions in Bandar Kangan and Jam. Unconfirmed social media reports suggested the islands of Kish and Qeshm may also have been struck, though CENTCOM's post-mission statement did not include them.

The scope of the operation, three nights running, more than 50,000 American service members deployed across the Middle East, and a reinstated naval blockade of Iran's ports, marks the most sustained direct U.S. military action against Iran in decades. And the president made clear he has no intention of pulling back.

Trump: 'We're hitting them very heavy'

Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office while the strikes were underway, Trump left no ambiguity about the scale of force.

"We have tremendous amounts of ammunition. We have numbers that we haven't had in years, and we're hitting them very hard and it'll continue, and we'll see what happens. But we're knocking out all of their offensive capability, and we're controlling the straits."

The president also confirmed that Washington had reinstated a full naval blockade of Iranian ports, a measure he described as narrowly targeted. "We're putting the blockade back, and it's a blockade not for anybody but Iran," Trump said. "Anybody doing business with Iran can't go through. Everyone else will be able to go through."

The timeline leading to this point has moved fast. Trump formally notified Congress on Friday that the U.S. had resumed "limited" and "measured" kinetic strikes in Iran beginning July 7. A preliminary peace deal struck last month collapsed after Iran refused to abide by its terms. Trump claimed Washington reached yet another deal with Tehran just two days before the Monday strikes, and that Iran backed out of that one, too.

The pattern is familiar. Tehran negotiates, stalls, and reneges. The question for American policymakers has always been how long that cycle continues before someone changes the terms. Trump declared the ceasefire dead and appears to have answered that question with ordnance.

Three nights, dozens of targets

Sunday night's strikes, the second round, employed fighter aircraft, naval vessels, one-way attack aerial drones, and one-way attack sea drones against dozens of targets at multiple locations. CENTCOM said those strikes hit Iranian military air-defense systems, coastal radar sites, missile and drone capabilities, and small boats.

Monday's operation continued that degradation campaign. CENTCOM stated that U.S. forces "employed precision munitions against Iranian coastal defense systems, missile and drone sites, and maritime capabilities." The command's post-mission statement said the goal was straightforward: "further degrade Iran's ability to attack commercial shipping."

That commercial shipping point matters. The Strait of Hormuz carries roughly a fifth of the world's oil supply. When Iran threatened to close it, and, by some accounts, attempted to do so, the economic implications rippled far beyond the Middle East. Every tanker that can't transit the strait is a price spike at the pump for American families already squeezed by years of inflation.

Trump's response has been to reframe the strait not as a shared international waterway that the U.S. merely patrols, but as a chokepoint America will actively manage. Speaking on "Fox & Friends," Trump put it bluntly:

"We're taking over the strait. They have nothing. They've got nothing. So we're just going to hit them very hard, and we're going to, we're going to keep the strait, and we'll probably run it."

He went further, casting future American control in transactional terms.

"We'll become the guardian of the strait. Maybe we'll call it the guardian angel of the strait, and we should be reimbursed for that... We guarded it for nothing, and now we're going to guard it, we're going to get paid for guarding it."

Pickaxe Mountain and the nuclear question

The strikes on conventional military targets may not be the end of the campaign. On the Hugh Hewitt Show Monday, Trump signaled that a suspected underground nuclear facility known as Pickaxe Mountain, described as a hidden fortress that may house uranium stockpiles, could be next.

"We're going to take out Pickaxe Mountain. Tell the Iranians to be ready."

Trump added that the U.S. is monitoring the site closely. "We see no activity there. They're not doing well with their nuclear situation. Every time we hear about it, we blow it up. So they don't like talking about it. But we'll probably give Pickaxe a shot relatively soon."

That kind of public telegraphing is unusual. Whether it is a genuine operational preview or a pressure tactic designed to force Tehran back to the table, the message is unmistakable: the United States is prepared to escalate beyond coastal radar arrays and small-boat pens. Trump has previously disclosed standing orders to strike Iran under certain threat conditions, and the current campaign suggests those contingencies are no longer hypothetical.

A blockade, a broken deal, and an open question

The reinstated naval blockade adds an economic dimension to what has so far been a kinetic campaign. Trump said the blockade applies exclusively to vessels doing business with Iran. Everyone else, he said, may transit freely. The practical enforcement of that distinction, identifying, boarding, and turning back ships in one of the world's busiest waterways, is an enormous operational commitment. CENTCOM noted that the 50,000-plus American service members in the region "remain vigilant, lethal, and ready."

What remains unclear is the legal architecture underneath the campaign. Trump notified Congress on Friday, as required, but the statutory authority cited in that notification, whether it rests on the War Powers Act, an existing authorization for use of military force, or Article II commander-in-chief powers, has not been publicly disclosed in available reporting. Congress will inevitably press that question. Whether it does so with urgency or merely performative concern will say a great deal about the seriousness of the institution.

Also missing from the picture: casualties. Neither CENTCOM nor Iranian state media, as reported, has disclosed any casualty figures from the third night of strikes. That silence could mean many things. It could reflect the precision of the munitions. It could reflect information control on both sides. It leaves a gap that will need filling as the days go on.

The broader context makes the stakes plain. Israeli intelligence recently revealed a fresh Iranian assassination plot targeting Trump as the ceasefire collapsed, a disclosure that added a personal threat dimension to an already volatile confrontation. And Trump has previously raised the prospect of seizing Iran's Kharg Island oil hub, signaling that economic warfare and kinetic operations may converge if Tehran continues to resist.

The case for resolve

Critics will call this escalation reckless. They said the same thing when Trump ordered the strike that killed Qasem Soleimani in 2020. The predicted regional conflagration never materialized then. Whether it materializes now depends on Iran's calculation of its own interests, and on whether the regime believes America will sustain this pressure or blink.

Three consecutive nights of strikes, a naval blockade, and a public promise to seize operational control of the world's most important oil chokepoint are not the actions of a government looking for an off-ramp. They are the actions of a government that watched Iran break two deals in a matter of weeks and decided the cost of restraint now exceeds the cost of force.

The people who benefit from a secure Strait of Hormuz are not defense contractors or foreign-policy think tanks. They are truckers filling their tanks, families paying their heating bills, and every economy on earth that runs on affordable energy. Iran's regime has spent decades threatening to hold that lifeline hostage. For the first time, someone is calling the bet.

Deals work when both sides keep them. Tehran has now demonstrated, twice in a month, that it won't. At some point, the only language a regime understands is the one spoken at 4:45 p.m. ET from the flight decks and launch tubes of the United States military.

About Alex Tanzer

Real Talk. Daily.

No spin. No fluff. Just the hard truth. served straight. Every morning, we cut through the noise and deliver what really matters to hardworking Americans. No agendas. No media games. Just real talk you can trust.