Trump enters Situation Room for final call on Iran nuclear deal as blockade lifts

By Marissa George
updated on May 29, 2026

President Donald Trump announced Friday that he convened his top political and military advisers in the White House Situation Room to make what he called a "final determination" on a nuclear deal with Iran, a dramatic move that came less than a day after Kuwait intercepted missiles fired from Iranian territory and amid unresolved sticking points over the Strait of Hormuz.

The announcement, posted on Truth Social, arrived after weeks of intense diplomatic back-and-forth between U.S. and Iranian negotiators over a working memorandum of understanding. That document would extend a current ceasefire for two more months and immediately reopen the strait, the narrow waterway responsible for moving one-fifth of all global oil.

Trump also announced the lifting of what he called the "amazing and unprecedented Naval Blockade" imposed on Iran, a blockade that had choked off Tehran's oil trade with China and other Asian buyers. And he laid down three hard conditions for any agreement: Iran must vow never to pursue a nuclear bomb, hand over its enriched uranium, and reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

Three conditions and a $300 billion question

The president's public conditions amount to a demand for full nuclear capitulation, something no previous administration extracted from Tehran. Whether Iran has formally accepted those terms or whether they are being proposed for the first time remains unclear from available official statements.

On Truth Social, Trump wrote:

"I will be meeting now, in the Situation Room, to make a final determination."

He added a message to military personnel: "Say HELLO to your wives, husbands, parents, and families from me, your favorite President!" The tone suggested confidence, but the substance remained unresolved as recently as the night before.

Vice President JD Vance told reporters Thursday evening that the outcome was far from certain. Just The News reported on Vance's remarks, in which he said:

"It's hard to say exactly when or if the president's going to sign. We're going back and forth on a couple of language points."

What those language points involve, Vance did not say. But one flashpoint is money. The New York Times reported Friday that the deal references a $300 billion investment fund, a figure that surfaced after Tehran demanded reparations payments from the United States. Trump pushed back publicly, writing on Truth Social: "No money money will be exchanged, until further notice."

That line, apparently containing a typo, drew attention, but its operational meaning is clear enough: the president is signaling he will not write Iran a check as part of any framework, at least not yet. For conservatives who remember the Obama-era pallets of cash flown to Tehran, the distinction matters.

The Strait of Hormuz standoff

The strait has been the central pressure point in this confrontation. Iran effectively shut down commercial movement through the waterway by seizing oil tankers with speedboats and deploying explosive ocean mines, according to reporting on the crisis. U.S. underwater mine sweepers already destroyed numerous mines in the area, and Trump demanded that Iran remove or detonate any that remain.

Tehran's negotiating posture has been aggressive. Iran demanded U.S. withdrawal from the region, joint control of the strait with Oman, and transit fees on U.S.-backed oil tankers. Trump responded earlier this week by threatening to bomb Oman, a key U.S. ally in the Middle East, if it cooperated with Iran on controlling the waterway.

That threat underscored how far the administration is willing to go to keep the strait open and deny Iran leverage over global energy markets. As draft terms on the Strait of Hormuz and the nuclear program emerged in recent days, the stakes of this particular negotiation became impossible to overstate.

U.S. Central Command reported that Kuwait intercepted Iranian missiles less than a day before Trump's Situation Room announcement, a reminder that diplomacy is unfolding against the backdrop of active hostilities, not a quiet conference table.

Nuclear material and the IAEA

The military dimension extends well beyond the strait. The Pentagon has claimed that Iran's navy has been eliminated. Trump stated that Iran's "Nuclear Dust", nuclear material buried beneath mountains after U.S. bombing raids, would be unearthed and destroyed by American troops working in coordination with the Iranian regime and the International Atomic Energy Agency.

That arrangement, if it holds, would represent an extraordinary level of on-the-ground cooperation between the U.S. military, an international nuclear watchdog, and a regime that has spent decades evading inspections. The details of how that coordination would work, who would verify compliance, and what timeline applies have not been made public.

The administration has been building toward this moment for weeks. Trump convened his full Cabinet at Camp David as the Iran talks reached a critical phase, and the diplomatic track has moved in parallel with military operations that degraded Iran's naval capacity and cleared mines from shipping lanes.

Oil markets react

Financial markets moved on the news. Brent crude fell to $92 per barrel as traders priced in the possibility that the strait would reopen and Iranian oil could flow again. The drop reflects both relief and uncertainty, relief that a full-scale war may be averted, uncertainty about whether the deal will actually close.

The ceasefire extension at the heart of the memorandum of understanding would buy another two months of relative calm. A 60-day ceasefire extension has been a central piece of the framework, giving both sides time to work through the harder questions, including what happens to Iran's enrichment infrastructure and whether any investment fund materializes.

For American consumers already squeezed by energy costs, the reopening of the strait and the stabilization of oil prices would be welcome. But the price of a bad deal, one that leaves Iran's nuclear ambitions intact or funnels hundreds of billions into Tehran's coffers, would be far steeper over time.

What remains unanswered

Newsmax reported on the Situation Room meeting, noting the high-stakes nature of the session. But several questions remain open. Has Iran formally agreed to all three of Trump's conditions, or is the administration still negotiating the terms it announced publicly? What specific language is Vance referring to when he says negotiators are "going back and forth"? And what happens if Iran refuses to hand over its enriched uranium?

The administration has also tied the Iran nuclear deal to an expansion of the Abraham Accords, demanding that six Muslim nations sign on, a condition that dramatically widens the scope of what any agreement must accomplish.

Trump himself acknowledged the personal weight of the moment. He has said the Iran conflict could keep him from his own son's wedding this weekend, a detail that, whatever else it reveals, shows the president treating this as a genuine crisis requiring his direct, sustained attention.

The composition of the advisory team in the Situation Room has not been disclosed beyond Vance and a general reference to top political and military advisers. What guidance they offered, and whether there was internal disagreement, remains unknown.

The stakes are plain

The last time an American president struck a nuclear deal with Iran, the result was the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, an agreement that lifted sanctions, released frozen assets, and left Tehran's enrichment infrastructure largely intact. Critics on the right argued for years that the deal enriched the regime without disarming it. Trump withdrew from that agreement during his first term.

Now he is attempting something far more ambitious: a deal that would require Iran to surrender its enriched uranium, accept international verification of nuclear material destruction, reopen a critical global waterway, and do all of it without receiving a cash payout. Whether that framework survives contact with reality is the open question.

The right answer on Iran has never been the easy one. But if the terms Trump laid out hold, this would be a fundamentally different kind of deal than the one his predecessor celebrated. The test is whether the terms actually hold, or whether they dissolve the moment the cameras leave the Situation Room.

About Marissa George

Marissa is a staff writer for Real Talk Digest. She is en expert in breaking down the political boondoggle into the real facts for real people.

Real Talk. Daily.

No spin. No fluff. Just the hard truth. served straight. Every morning, we cut through the noise and deliver what really matters to hardworking Americans. No agendas. No media games. Just real talk you can trust.